ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019
Gender Identification of Human Cortical 3-D Morphology Using Hierarchical Sparsity.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Sex and Gender Have Separate Identities?Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Review
- Classifying sex with volume-matched brain MRI.Neuroimage. Reports · 2023Article
- Fine temporal brain network structure modularizes and localizes differently in men and women: insights from a novel explainability framework.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- The Human Brain Is Best Described as Being on a Female/Male Continuum: Evidence from a Neuroimaging Connectivity Study.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Constructing and evaluating a cortical surface atlas and analyzing cortical sex differences in young Chinese adults.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- A Deep Network Model on Dynamic Functional Connectivity With Applications to Gender Classification and Intelligence Prediction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Difference exists widely in cognition, behavior and psychopathology between males and females, while the underlying neurobiology is still unclear. As brain structure is the fundament of its function, getting insight into structural brain may help us to better understand the functional mechanism of gender difference. Previous structural studies of gender difference in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) usually focused on gray matter (GM) concentration and structural connectivity (SC), leaving cortical morphology not characterized properly. In this study a large dataset is used to explore whether cortical three-dimensional (3-D) morphology can offer enough discriminative morphological features to effectively identify gender. Data of all available healthy controls (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.