Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792547›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2019

Circulating and Disseminated Tumour Cells in Breast Carcinoma: Report from the Consensus Conference on Tumour Cell Dissemination during the 38th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Senology, Berlin, 14 June 2018.

Malgorzata Banys-Paluchowski, Andreas Hartkopf, Franziska Meier-Stiegen, Wolfgang Janni, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Tanja Fehm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Liquid biopsy in metastatic breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Malgorzata Banys-PaluchowskiFrauenklinik, Asklepios-Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas HartkopfUniversitäts-Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Gemany.
Franziska Meier-StiegenKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniFrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Erich-Franz SolomayerKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Tanja FehmKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEOlgahospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haematogenic dissemination of tumour cells in breast carcinoma is among the most intensively researched areas in translational oncology. Large meta-analyses have shown the prognostic relevance of the disseminated tumour cells in the bone marrow and circulating tumour cells in the peripheral blood in the adjuvant as well as metastatic setting. The current status of the research was discussed in detail during the annual meeting of the German Society of Senology in Berlin. The following conference report gives an overview of the clinical study landscape and the new methodological developments for improving the detection and phenotyping of the circulating and disseminated tumour cells.

Indexed as

breast carcinomacirculating tumour cellsdisseminated tumour cellstumour cell dissemination

Identifiers

PMID30792547
PMCPMC6379163
OpenAlexW4232611825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.