Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792440›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparisons between multi-component myelin water fraction, T1w/T2w ratio, and diffusion tensor imaging measures in healthy human brain structures.

Md Nasir Uddin, Teresa D Figley, Kevin G Solar, Anwar S Shatil, Chase R Figley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Nasir UddinDepartment of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. uddinmn359@gmail.com.
Teresa D FigleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kevin G SolarDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Anwar S ShatilBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Chase R FigleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. cfigley@gmail.com.

Funding

Information & Hierarchical Organization in the Neural Systems for Working MemoryR01MH082957 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COURTNEY-FARUQEE, SUSAN M · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various MRI techniques, including myelin water imaging, T1w/T2w ratio mapping and diffusion-based imaging can be used to characterize tissue microstructure. However, surprisingly few studies have examined the degree to which these MRI measures are related within and between various brain regions. Therefore, whole-brain MRI scans were acquired from 31 neurologically-healthy participants to empirically measure and compare myelin water fraction (MWF), T1w/T2w ratio, fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD) and mean diffusivity (MD) in 25 bilateral (10 grey matter; 15 white matter) regions-of-interest (ROIs). Except for RD vs. T1w/T2w, MD vs. T1w/T2w, moderately significant to highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between each of the other measures across all 25 brain structures [T1w/T2w vs. MWF (Pearson r = 0.33, Spearman ρ = 0.31), FA vs. MWF (r = 0.73, ρ = 0.75), FA vs. T1w/T2w (r = 0.25, ρ = 0.22), MD vs. AD (r = 0.57, ρ = 0.58), MD vs. RD (r = 0.64, ρ = 0.61), AD vs. MWF (r = 0.43, ρ = 0.36), RD vs. MWF (r = -0.49, ρ = -0.62), MD vs. MWF (r = -0.22, ρ = -0.29), RD vs. FA (r = -0.62, ρ = -0.75) and MD vs. FA (r = -0.22, ρ = -0.18)]. However, while all six MRI measures were correlated with each other across all structures, there were large intra-ROI and inter-ROI differences (i.e., with no one measure consistently producing the highest or lowest values). This suggests that each quantitative MRI measure provides unique, and potentially complimentary, information about underlying brain tissues - with each metric offering unique sensitivity/specificity tradeoffs to different microstructural properties (e.g., myelin content, tissue density, etc.).

Indexed as

AdultDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGray MatterHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelin SheathNeuroimagingWhite MatterYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30792440
PMCPMC6384876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.