ArticleScientific reports2019
Chromosome transmission in BC
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multitrait Evaluation of Drought Tolerance at the Seedling Stage in Advanced Backcross Germplasm Derived from Sugarcane ×Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From n + n to 2n + n: Unconventional Chromosome Inheritance and Stable Retention of the EntirePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Oligonucleotide Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: An Efficient Chromosome Painting Method in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Efficient Anchoring of Erianthus arundinaceus Chromatin Introgressed into Sugarcane by Specific Molecular MarkersInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Erianthus germplasm collection in Thailand: genetic structure and phylogenetic aspects of tetraploid and hexaploid accessions.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Field evaluation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Chromosomal Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intergeneric hybrids between Saccharum spp. and Erianthus arundinaceus and clones derived from these hybrids and backcrosses to Saccharum spp. were used to study the transmission of E. arundinaceus chromosomes by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). True hybrid progenies were precisely identified using PCR with a primer pair, AGRP52/53. The results showed that AGRP52/53 was an E. arundinaceus-specific primer pair and could be used as molecular marker to assist breeding. EaHN92, a 364 bp E. arundinaceus-specific tandem repeat satellite DNA sequence, was cloned from the E. arundinaceus clone HN92-105 with AGRP52/53, and was localized on sub-telomeric regions of all E. arundinaceus chromosomes. YCE06-61, a BC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.