Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792306›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Stimulation of heat shock protein 90 chaperone function through binding of a novobiocin analog KU-32.

Bhaskar K Chatterjee, Abhilash Jayaraj, Vinay Kumar, Brian Blagg, Rachel E Davis, B Jayaram, Shashank Deep, Tapan K Chaudhuri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Recent advances toward the development of Hsp90 C-terminal inhibitors.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The heat shock response and small molecule regulators.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bhaskar K ChatterjeeFrom the Kusuma School of Biological Sciences.
Abhilash Jayarajthe Supercomputing Facility for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, and.
Vinay Kumarthe Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India and.
Brian Blaggthe Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.
Rachel E Davisthe Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.ORCID 0000-0003-0359-381X
B Jayaramthe Supercomputing Facility for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, and.
Shashank Deepthe Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India and.
Tapan K ChaudhuriFrom the Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, tkchaudhuri@bioschool.iitd.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-1640
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · INNational Center for Supercomputing Applications · BGOtsuma Women's University · JPUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a eukaryotic chaperone responsible for the folding and functional activation of numerous client proteins, many of which are oncoproteins. Thus, Hsp90 inhibition has been intensely pursued, resulting in the development of many potential Hsp90 inhibitors, not all of which are well-characterized. Hsp90 inhibitors not only abrogate its chaperone functions, but also could help us gain insight into the structure-function relationship of this chaperone. Here, using biochemical and cell-based assays along with isothermal titration calorimetry, we investigate KU-32, a derivative of the Hsp90 inhibitor novobiocin (NB), for its ability to modulate Hsp90 chaperone function. Although NB and KU-32 differ only slightly in structure, we found that upon binding, they induce completely opposite conformational changes in Hsp90. We observed that NB and KU-32 both bind to the C-terminal domain of Hsp90, but surprisingly, KU-32 stimulated the chaperone functions of Hsp90 via allosteric modulation of its N-terminal domain, responsible for the chaperone's ATPase activity.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsAllosteric RegulationCell SurvivalHeLa CellsHumansNovobiocinProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein FoldingEnzyme InhibitorsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsKU-32 compoundNovobiocinallosteric modulationchaperone-assisted protein foldingconformational changeheat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)KU-32molecular chaperonemolecular dynamicsneuropathynovobiocinprotein-drug interaction

Identifiers

PMID30792306
PMCPMC6484110
OpenAlexW2916165644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.