Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792249›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Focal Hypoperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke Perfusion CT: Clinical and Radiologic Predictors and Accuracy for Infarct Prediction.

O Bill, N M Inácio, D Lambrou, M Wintermark, G Ntaios, V Dunet, P Michel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and blood-brain barrier disruption in uninjured brain areas of rhesus monkeys subjected to transient ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

O BillFrom the Neurology Service (O.B., D.L., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences olivier.bill@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3874-0242
N M InácioNeurology Department (N.M.I.), Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4035-1898
D LambrouFrom the Neurology Service (O.B., D.L., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences.ORCID 0000-0001-8989-8547
M WintermarkDepartment of Radiology (M.W.), Neuroradiology Division, Stanford University and Medical Center, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-3951
G NtaiosDepartment of Medicine (G.N.), University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-9248
V DunetDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (V.D.), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9897-4561
P MichelFrom the Neurology Service (O.B., D.L., P.M.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-7579
Neurosciences Institute · USHospital Beatriz Ângelo · PTStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePerfusion CT may improve the diagnostic performance of noncontrast CT in acute ischemic stroke. We assessed predictors of focal hypoperfusion in acute ischemic stroke and perfusion CT performance in predicting infarction on follow-up imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients from the Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne data base with acute ischemic stroke and perfusion CT were included. Clinical and radiologic data were collected. We identified predictors of focal hypoperfusion using multivariate analyses.

resultsFrom the 2216 patients with perfusion CT, 38.2% had an acute ischemic lesion on NCCT and 73.3% had focal hypoperfusion on perfusion CT. After we analyzed 104 covariates, high-admission NIHSS, visual field defect, aphasia, hemineglect, sensory deficits, and impaired consciousness were positively associated with focal hypoperfusion. Negative associations were pure posterior circulation, lacunar strokes, and anticoagulation. After integrating radiologic variables into the multivariate analyses, we found that visual field defect, sensory deficits, hemineglect, early ischemic changes on NCCT, anterior circulation, cardioembolic etiology, and arterial occlusion were positively associated with focal hypoperfusion, whereas increasing onset-to-CT delay, chronic vascular lesions, and lacunar etiology showed negative association. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of focal hypoperfusion on perfusion CT for infarct detection on follow-up MR imaging were 66.5%, 79.4%, 96.2%, and 22.8%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 76.8%.

conclusionsCompared with NCCT, perfusion CT doubles the sensitivity in detecting acute ischemic stroke. Focal hypoperfusion is independently predicted by stroke severity, cortical clinical deficits, nonlacunar supratentorial strokes, and shorter onset-to-imaging delays. A high proportion of patients with focal hypoperfusion developed infarction on subsequent imaging, as did some patients without focal hypoperfusion, indicating the complementarity of perfusion CT and MR imaging in acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPerfusion ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30792249
PMCPMC7028679
OpenAlexW2918006306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.