The global burden of enteric fevers in the age of typhoid-conjugate vaccines.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Hospitalization of Pediatric Enteric Fever Cases, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2017-2019: Incidence and Risk Factors.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
   Article
2. Emergence of Novel Mutations in Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi from Pakistan.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as