Trial reportSurgery2019
Comparing clinical judgment with the MySurgeryRisk algorithm for preoperative risk assessment: A pilot usability study.
Trial report in Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology Practice: From Implementation Concerns to Imaging and Clinical Application.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.Anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring alternative approaches to precision medicine through genomics and artificial intelligence - a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning to guide clinical decision-making in abdominal surgery-a systematic literature review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of machine learning models on clinician prediction of postoperative complications: the Perioperative ORACLE randomised clinical trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Trial
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in transplantation surgery care pathway.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- Effects of AI Assistance Timing on Pharmacists' Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: Within-Participants Experimental Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: innovations, integration, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Enhanced examinations, ambient intelligence and the future of clinical practice.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Review
- The complex task of modelling artificial intelligence workflows for forecasting postoperative risk.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- DiabCompSepsAI: Integrated AI Model for Early Detection and Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Diabetic Patients-Using a Random Forest Classifier.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The algorithmic consultant: a new era of clinical AI calls for a new workforce of physician-algorithm specialists.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- German surgeons' perspective on the application of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor postoperative complications are associated with increased cost and mortality. The complexity of electronic health records overwhelms physicians' abilities to use the information for optimal and timely preoperative risk assessment. We hypothesized that data-driven, predictive-risk algorithms implemented in an intelligent decision-support platform simplify and augment physicians' risk assessments.
methodsThis prospective, nonrandomized pilot study of 20 physicians at a quaternary academic medical center compared the usability and accuracy of preoperative risk assessment between physicians and MySurgeryRisk, a validated, machine-learning algorithm, using a simulated workflow for the real-time, intelligent decision-support platform. We used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the accuracy of physicians' risk assessment for six postoperative complications before and after interaction with the algorithm for 150 clinical cases.
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the MySurgeryRisk algorithm ranged between 0.73 and 0.85 and was significantly better than physicians' initial risk assessments (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.47 and 0.69) for all postoperative complications except cardiovascular. After interaction with the algorithm, the physicians significantly improved their risk assessment for acute kidney injury and for an intensive care unit admission greater than 48 hours, resulting in a net improvement of reclassification of 12% and 16%, respectively. Physicians rated the algorithm as easy to use and useful.
conclusionImplementation of a validated, MySurgeryRisk computational algorithm for real-time predictive analytics with data derived from the electronic health records to augment physicians' decision-making is feasible and accepted by physicians. Early involvement of physicians as key stakeholders in both design and implementation of this technology will be crucial for its future success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.