ArticleBMC medicine2019
Building a learning community of Australian clinical genomics: a social network study of the Australian Genomic Health Alliance.
Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing general practitioner and consumer supports for genomics in Australian primary care: a mixed-methods protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Genomic sequencing technologies for rare disease in mainstream healthcare: the current state of implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- The National Paediatric Applied Research Translation Initiative (N-PARTI): using implementation science to improve primary care for Australian children with asthma, type 1 diabetes, and infections.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Adopting Public Health Genomics when the House Is on Fire: How Will We Navigate to 2030?Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Balancing the safeguarding of privacy and data sharing: perceptions of genomic professionals on patient genomic data ownership in Australia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Implementation of large, multi-site hospital interventions: a realist evaluation of strategies for developing capability.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenomic curriculum in Australian medical schools: a content analysis study.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: a scoping review and iterative synthesis.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Review
- "A very big challenge": a qualitative study to explore the early barriers and enablers to implementing a national genomic medicine service in England.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Mapping continuous learning using social network research: a social network study of Australian Genomics as a Learning Health System.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Networks to strengthen community social capital for suicide prevention in regional Australia: the LifeSpan suicide prevention initiative.International journal of mental health systems · 2022Article
- A dynamic systems view of clinical genomics: a rich picture of the landscape in Australia using a complexity science lens.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Twelve quick steps for genome assembly and annotation in the classroom.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Preparing Medical Specialists for Genomic Medicine: Continuing Education Should Include Opportunities for Experiential Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Australian Genomics: A Federated Model for Integrating Genomics into Healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdopting clinical genomics represents a major systems-level intervention requiring diverse expertise and collective learning. The Australian Genomic Health Alliance (Australian Genomics) is strategically linking members and partner organisations to lead the integration of genomic medicine into healthcare across Australia. This study aimed to map and analyse interconnections between members-a key feature of complexity-to capture the collaborations among the genomic community, document learning, assess Australian Genomics' influence and identify key players.
methodsAn online, whole network study collected relational data from members asking them about two time points: baseline, before Australian Genomics started operation in 2016 and current in 2018. Likert style questions assessed the influence of various sources of knowledge on the respondents' genomic practice. A secure link to the online questionnaire was distributed to all members of Australian Genomics during May 2018. Social network data was analysed and visually constructed using Gephi 0.9.2 software, and Likert questions were analysed using chi-squared computations in SPSS. The project was given ethical approval.
resultsResponse rate was 57.81% (222/384). The genomic learning community within Australian Genomics was constructed from the responses of participants. There was a growth in ties from pre-2016 (2925 ties) to 2018 (6381 ties) and an increase in density (0.020 to 0.043) suggesting the strong influence of Australian Genomics in creating this community. Respondents nominated 355 collaborative partners from 24 different countries outside of Australia and 328 partners from within Australia but outside the alliance. Key players were the Australian Genomics Manager, two clinical geneticists and four Operational staff members. Most influential sources of learning were hands on learning, shared decision making, journal articles and conference presentations in contrast to formal courses.
conclusionsThe successful implementation of clinical genomics requires the engagement of multidisciplinary teams across a range of conditions and expertise. Australian Genomics is shown to be facilitating this collaborative process by strategically building a genomic learning community. We demonstrate the importance of social processes in building complex networks as respondents name "hands on learning" and "making group decisions" the most potent influences of their genomic practice. This has implications for genomic implementation, education and work force strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.