Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791791›Full record

SynthesisExpert review of gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Endoscopic management of complications of acute pancreatitis: an update on the field.

Ali Aghdassi, Peter Simon, Tilman Pickartz, Christoph Budde, Mariya E Skube, Markus M Lerch

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of severe acute pancreatitis in 2019.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali Aghdassia Department of Medicine A , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany.
Peter Simona Department of Medicine A , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany.
Tilman Pickartza Department of Medicine A , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany.
Christoph Buddea Department of Medicine A , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany.
Mariya E Skubeb Department of Surgery , University of Minnesota Medical Center , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
Markus M Lercha Department of Medicine A , University Medicine Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Training the Next Generation of Surgeon-Scientists in PancreatologyT32DK108733 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Srinath Chinnakotla, MASATO YAMAMOTO · 2017 to 2026
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK108733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute pancreatitis is a frequent, nonmalignant gastrointestinal disorder leading to hospital admission. For its severe form and subsequent complications, minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures are being used increasingly, and are subject to rapid technical advances. Areas covered: Based on a systematic literature search in PubMed, medline, and Web-of-Science, we discuss the currently available treatment strategies for endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts, walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS), and compare the efficacy and safety of plastic and metal stents. A special focus is placed on studies directly comparing different stent types, including lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and clinical outcomes when draining pseudocysts or WONs. The clinical significance and endoscopic treatment options for DPDS are also discussed. Expert commentary: Endoscopic therapy has become the treatment of choice for different types of pancreatic and peripancreatic collections, the majority of which, however, require no intervention. The use of LAMS has facilitated drainage and necrosectomy in patients with WON or pseudocysts. Serious complications remain a problem in spite of high technical and clinical success rates. DPDS is an increasingly recognized problem in the presence of pseudocysts or WONs but evidence for endoscopic stent placement in this situation remains insufficient.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageEndosonographyHumansPancreatic PseudocystPancreatitisPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingProsthesis DesignStentsSyndromeTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAcute pancreatitisendoscopylumen-apposing metal stentpseudocysttherapywalled-off pancreatic necrosis

Identifiers

PMID30791791
PMCPMC11851565
OpenAlexW2897766035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.