Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791732›Full record

ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies

Network Meta-Analysis of Chinese Herbal Injections Plus the FOLFOX Regimen for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in China.

Dan Zhang, Jiarui Wu, Xiaojiao Duan, Kaihuan Wang, Mengwei Ni, Shuyu Liu, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Zhang, Yi Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Effect of CompoundEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan Zhang1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiarui Wu1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaojiao Duan1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Kaihuan Wang1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mengwei Ni1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Shuyu Liu1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaomeng Zhang1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Bing Zhang1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yi Zhao1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present network meta-analysis (NMA) was to explore the comparative effectiveness and safety of different Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) combined with the FOLFOX regimen versus FOLFOX alone for colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsA comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed with regard to different CHIs for treating CRC in several electronic databases up to July 2016. The quality assessment of the included RCTs was conducted according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Standard pair-wise and Bayesian NMA were designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different CHIs combined with the FOLFOX regimen by utilizing WinBUGS 1.4.3 and Stata 13.1 software, simultaneously.

resultsInitially, a total of 820 citations were retrieved through comprehensive searching, and 60 eligible articles involving 4849 participants and 14 CHIs were ultimately included. The results of the current evidence indicated that the FOLFOX regimen combined with Delisheng, Kanglaite, Shenqifuzheng, or Aidi injections were associated with the most favorable clinical efficacy compared with the FOLFOX regimen alone. Additionally, the FOLFOX regimen combined with Delisheng, Xiaoaiping, Lentinan, Kangai, Shenqifuzheng, or Aidi injections improved performance status among patients with CRC.

conclusionsThe results of cluster analysis demonstrated that the combination of Compound matrine injection and FOLFOX regimen was associated with more preferable and beneficial outcomes than other CHIs groups. Nevertheless, the additional results from multicenter trials and high-quality studies will be pivotal for supporting our findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBayes TheoremChinaColorectal NeoplasmsDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleFluorouracilHumansInjectionsLeucovorinMaleOrganoplatinum CompoundsDrugs, Chinese HerbalFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsChinese herbal injectionscolorectal cancerFOLFOX regimennetwork meta-analysisrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID30791732
PMCPMC7242776
OpenAlexW2913334637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.