Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791654›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

A Deliberate Choice? Exploring the Decision to Switch from Cigarettes to E-Cigarettes.

Kim A G J Romijnders, Liesbeth van Osch, Hein de Vries, Reinskje Talhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kim A G J RomijndersCentre for Health Protection (GZB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, 3721 MA, the Netherlands. kim.romijnders@rivm.nl.
Liesbeth van OschDepartment of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, POB 616 6200 MD, the Netherlands. liesbeth.vanosch@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, POB 616 6200 MD, the Netherlands. hein.devries@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Reinskje TalhoutCentre for Health Protection (GZB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, 3721 MA, the Netherlands. reinskje.talhout@rivm.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarettes are increasingly popular among both cigarette smokers and non-users. Although smoking cessation yields the most individual and population health benefits, switching to exclusive e-cigarette use offers some individual health benefits for cigarette smokers. However, e-cigarette use is not harmless, and its use among non-cigarette smokers should be prevented. Our study aims to explore the decision-making process about e-cigarettes among an e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, and non-users. We conducted 12 semi-structured focus group interviews with e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, and non-users. We performed a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. First, knowledge reported by e-cigarette users was mainly based on other users' experiences. Second, cigarette smokers and non-users were more negative towards e-cigarettes than e-cigarette users. Third, e-cigarette users considered switching from cigarette smoking to e-cigarette use by deliberating relevant information, and weighing up the benefits and disadvantages of e-cigarette use versus smoking. Additionally, important factors in the decision-making process were a perception of risks and benefits of e-cigarettes compared to cigarettes, a supportive social environment about e-cigarette use, and trust in information offered about the risks and benefits of e-cigarettes. Our findings provide insight into what we can learn from the conscious decision-making process of e-cigarette users who switched from cigarettes to e-cigarettes. This information can be considered to develop targeted communications strategies to stimulate a conscious decision-making process, these may highlight benefits of switching to e-cigarettes for cigarette smokers, discussing the risks of smoking, and correcting misperceptions about the perceived risks and benefits of e-cigarette use.

Indexed as

Decision MakingVapingAdolescentAdultCigarette SmokingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleYoung Adultdual usefocus groupsharm reductioninformed decision makingqualitative researchsmoking preventiontargeted communication

Identifiers

PMID30791654
PMCPMC6406587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.