Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791546›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

A Pilot Study of Vaccine Therapy with Multiple Glioma Oncoantigen/Glioma Angiogenesis-Associated Antigen Peptides for Patients with Recurrent/Progressive High-Grade Glioma.

Ryogo Kikuchi, Ryo Ueda, Katsuya Saito, Shunsuke Shibao, Hideaki Nagashima, Ryota Tamura, Yukina Morimoto, Hikaru Sasaki, Shinobu Noji, Yutaka Kawakami and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Silencing LY6K Suppresses CD44Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tumor vaccines: Toward multidimensional anti-tumor therapies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryogo KikuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 254-0019, Japan. fi020084@yahoo.co.jp.
Ryo UedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. ueda.ryo@gmail.com.
Katsuya SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Tochigi 326-0843, Japan. csrbb415@yahoo.co.jp.
Shunsuke ShibaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Tochigi 326-0843, Japan. pochisuke616@mac.com.
Hideaki NagashimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. 032m2068@gmail.com.
Ryota TamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. moltobello-r-610@hotmail.co.jp.
Yukina MorimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. yukinaxnashiko@yahoo.co.jp.
Hikaru SasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. hsasaki@a5.keio.jp.
Shinobu NojiDivision of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. snoji@keio.jp.
Yutaka KawakamiDivision of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. yutakawa@keio.jp.
Kazunari YoshidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. Kazrmky@keio.jp.
Masahiro TodaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8587, Japan. todam@keio.jp.
Keio University · JPAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17K16661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) carry a dismal prognosis despite current treatments. We previously confirmed the safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine treatment targeting tumor angiogenesis with synthetic peptides, for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) epitopes in recurrent HGG patients. In this study, we evaluated a novel vaccine therapy targeting not only tumor vasculature but also tumor cells, using multiple glioma oncoantigen (GOA)/glioma angiogenesis-associated antigen (GAAA) peptides in HLA-A2402+ recurrent/progressive HGG patients. The vaccine included peptide epitopes from four GOAs (LY6K, DEPDC1, KIF20A, and FOXM1) and two GAAAs (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2). Ten patients received subcutaneous vaccinations. The primary endpoint was the safety of the treatment. T-lymphocyte responses against GOA/GAAA epitopes and treatment response were evaluated secondarily. The treatment was well tolerated without any severe systemic adverse events. The vaccinations induced immunoreactivity to at least three vaccine-targeted GOA/GAAA in all six evaluable patients. The median overall survival time in all patients was 9.2 months. Five achieved progression-free status lasting at least six months. Two recurrent glioblastoma patients demonstrated stable disease. One patient with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma achieved complete response nine months after the vaccination. Taken together, this regimen was well tolerated and induced robust GOA/GAAA-specific T-lymphocyte responses in recurrent/progressive HGG patients.

Indexed as

high-grade gliomaoncoantigentumor angiogenesistumor associate antigenvaccine therapy

Identifiers

PMID30791546
PMCPMC6406695
OpenAlexW2915626738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.