Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791377›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Multi-Pig Part Detection and Association with a Fully-Convolutional Network.

Eric T Psota, Mateusz Mittek, Lance C Pérez, Ty Schmidt, Benny Mote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Heterogeneity of Residual Variance for Foot Score Traits in American Angus Cattle.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Continuous NUTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. GooseDetectScientific data · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Utilizing NUAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Welfare Health and Productivity in Commercial Pig Herds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric T PsotaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68505, USA. epsota@unl.edu.
Mateusz MittekDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68505, USA. mmittek@gmail.com.
Lance C PérezDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68505, USA. lperez@unl.edu.
Ty SchmidtDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA. tschmidt4@unl.edu.
Benny MoteDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska⁻Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA. benny.mote@unl.edu.

Funding

National Pork Board NPB #16-122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision systems have the potential to provide automated, non-invasive monitoring of livestock animals, however, the lack of public datasets with well-defined targets and evaluation metrics presents a significant challenge for researchers. Consequently, existing solutions often focus on achieving task-specific objectives using relatively small, private datasets. This work introduces a new dataset and method for instance-level detection of multiple pigs in group-housed environments. The method uses a single fully-convolutional neural network to detect the location and orientation of each animal, where both body part locations and pairwise associations are represented in the image space. Accompanying this method is a new dataset containing 2000 annotated images with 24,842 individually annotated pigs from 17 different locations. The proposed method achieves over 99% precision and over 96% recall when detecting pigs in environments previously seen by the network during training. To evaluate the robustness of the trained network, it is also tested on environments and lighting conditions unseen in the training set, where it achieves 91% precision and 67% recall. The dataset is publicly available for download.

Indexed as

animal detectioncomputer visiondeep learningimage processingpose estimationprecision livestock

Identifiers

PMID30791377
PMCPMC6413214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.