Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30791092›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of surgery2019

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ.

F Magnoni, G Massari, G Santomauro, V Bagnardi, E Pagan, G Peruzzotti, V Galimberti, P Veronesi, V S Sacchini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F MagnoniEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
G MassariEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
G SantomauroEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
V BagnardiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
E PaganDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
G PeruzzottiEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
V GalimbertiEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
P VeronesiEuropean Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
V S SacchiniBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-9111
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroinvasive breast cancer is an uncommon pathological entity. Owing to the rarity of this condition, its surgical axillary management and overall prognosis remain controversial.

methodsA database was analysed to identify patients with microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who had surgery for invasive breast cancer at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, between 1998 and 2010. Women who had undergone axillary staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy were included in the study.

resultsOf 257 women with microinvasive breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), 226 (87·9 per cent) had negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and 31 had metastatic SLNs. Twelve patients had isolated tumour cells (ITCs), 14 had micrometastases and five had macrometastases in sentinel nodes. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed in 16 of the 31 patients with positive SLNs. After a median follow-up of 11 years, only one regional first event was observed in the 15 patients with positive SLNs who did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection. There were no regional first events in the 16 patients with positive SLNs who had axillary dissection.

conclusionGood disease-free and overall survival were found in women with positive SLNs and microinvasive DCIS. This study is in line with studies showing that SLNB in microinvasive DCIS may not be useful, and supports the evidence that less surgery can provide the same level of overall survival with better quality of life.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansItalyKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30791092
PMCPMC6393177
OpenAlexW2917286362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.