Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30790539›Full record

ReviewNeuron2019

Re-evaluating Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Pattern Separation.

N Alex Cayco-Gajic, R Angus Silver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The cerebellar components of the human language network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Stability through plasticity: Finding robust memories through representational drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N Alex Cayco-GajicDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
R Angus SilverDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: a.silver@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101445Wellcome Trust 203048Wellcome Trust 203048/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When animals interact with complex environments, their neural circuits must separate overlapping patterns of activity that represent sensory and motor information. Pattern separation is thought to be a key function of several brain regions, including the cerebellar cortex, insect mushroom body, and dentate gyrus. However, recent findings have questioned long-held ideas on how these circuits perform this fundamental computation. Here, we re-evaluate the functional and structural mechanisms underlying pattern separation. We argue that the dimensionality of the space available for population codes representing sensory and motor information provides a common framework for understanding pattern separation. We then discuss how these three circuits use different strategies to separate activity patterns and facilitate associative learning in the presence of trial-to-trial variability.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAnimalsHippocampusModels, NeurologicalSensorimotor Cortexcerebellumdecorrelationdimensionalityhippocampusinsect mushroom bodyneural circuitspattern separationsensorimotor processingsparse codingsparse connectivity

Identifiers

PMID30790539
PMCPMC7028396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.