ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2019
Coper Classification Early After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Changes With Progressive Neuromuscular and Strength Training and Is Associated With 2-Year Success: The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.
Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Pooled it
- Primary surgery versus primary rehabilitation for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Non-Operative Management of a Complete ACL Rupture With the Cross-Bracing Protocol in an Elite Australian Rules Football Athlete.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Passive Laxity With Functional Stability Reveals Potential Bilateral Dynamic Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction at Long-term Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of characteristics of patients who choose operative versus non-operative management after ACL injury: a latent class analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2025Article
- Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis with Indirect Femoral Fixation Using an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Suspensory Device.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Optimising the Early-Stage Rehabilitation Process Post-ACL Reconstruction.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- [Treatment of acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament : Always only reconstruction?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Underutilization of coper/non-coper screening in anterior cruciate ligament injuries management in Italy: an online survey.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
- Some, but not all, patients experience full symptom resolution and a positive rehabilitation process after ACL reconstruction: an interview study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- The development of long-term osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury: reconstruction vs no reconstruction.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- Four Distinct 5-Year Trajectories of Knee Function Emerge in Patients Who Followed the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Treatment Algorithm.The American journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- The top 100 most impactful articles on the anterior cruciate ligament: An altmetric analysis of online media.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
- Correlation among Knee Muscle Strength and Self-Reported Outcomes Score, Anterior Tibial Displacement, and Time Post-Injury in Non-Coper Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficient Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Risk Factors Related to the Presence of Meniscal Injury and Irreparable Meniscal Tear at Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Early Return to Sports to Continue the Season after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Is Not Recommended for Student Athletes.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Recovery of preoperative absolute knee extension and flexion strength after ACL reconstruction.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2020Article
- FUNCTIONAL MEASURES DO NOT DIFFER IN LATE STAGE REHABILITATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO MECHANISM OF INJURY.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2020Article
- Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome athletes demonstrate excellent dynamic stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and return to sport without ACL reconstruction (ACLR) (copers). Others demonstrate persistent instability despite rehabilitation (noncopers) and require surgical stabilization. Testing to determine coper classification can identify potential copers early after rupture. It is unclear how coper classification changes after a brief intervention and how early classification relates to long-term outcomes. PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the consistency of early coper classification (potential coper vs noncoper) before and after progressive neuromuscular and strength training (NMST) among athletes early after acute ACL rupture and (2) to evaluate the association of early coper classification with 2-year success after ACL rupture. STUDY
designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
methodsThis was a prospective analysis from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study, composed of athletes consecutively enrolled early after ACL rupture. Participants (n = 271) were tested and classified as potential copers or noncopers according to established criteria before and after a 10-session NMST program. Success 2 years after ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation was defined as meeting or exceeding sex- and age-matched norms for knee function, no ACL graft rupture, and ≤1 episode of giving way within the previous year. The McNemar test evaluated changes in coper classification pre- to posttraining. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the association of early coper classification and surgical status with 2-year success.
resultsOf 300 athletes enrolled, 271 (90%) completed the posttraining data collection, and 219 (73%) returned for the 2-year follow-up. The coper classifications were different between time points: nearly half of those classified initially as noncopers became potential copers ( P < .001). At the 2-year follow-up, 66% of the ACLR group and 74% of the nonoperative group were successful. Athletes who were potential copers posttraining and chose ACLR or nonoperative rehabilitation had 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.6) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.2-7.2) times the odds of success, respectively, as compared with noncopers who chose ACLR.
conclusionCoper classification improved after NMST; more athletes became potential copers. Athletes who were potential copers after NMST were more likely to succeed 2 years later regardless of whether they had surgery, strongly supporting the addition of NMST before ACLR. Persistent noncopers fared poorly, indicating that more intensive rehabilitation may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.