Correction to: Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Volume 81, Number 1, January 2019.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Inducing musical-interval learning by combining task practice with periods of stimulus exposure alone.2019
• Erratum for
  Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.2019
• Erratum for
  Listening back in time: Does attention to memory facilitate word-in-noise identification?2019
• Erratum for
  Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.2019
• Erratum for
  Gradual formation of visual working memory representations of motion directions.2019
• Erratum for
  Mid-level feature contributions to category-specific gaze guidance.2019
• Erratum for
  Competition between color and luminance in motion correspondence.2019
• Erratum for
  Selection for encoding: No evidence of better endogenous orienting following forget than following remember instructions.2019
• Erratum for
  Measuring the time course of selection during visual search.2019
• Erratum for
  Semisupervised category learning facilitates the development of automaticity.2019
• Erratum for
  Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.2019
• Erratum for
  Feature-based attention across saccades: Pop-out in color search is spatiotopic.2019
• Erratum for
  Sustained conscious access to incidental memories in RSVP.2019
• Erratum for
  The emotional attentional blink is robust to divided attention.2019
• Erratum for
  Measuring facial identity and emotion integration using the redundancy gain paradigm.2019
• Erratum for
  Remapping versus short-term memory in visual stability across saccades.2019
• Erratum for
  Effects of lexical ambiguity, frequency, and acoustic details in auditory perception.2019
• Erratum for
  Auditory spatial attention capture, disengagement, and response selection in normal aging.2019
• Erratum for
  Vection strength increases with simulated eye-separation.2019
• Erratum for
  Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.2019
• Erratum for
  Self-control and its influence on global/local processing: An investigation of the role of frontal alpha asymmetry and dispositional approach tendencies.2019
• Erratum for
  Why are you looking at me? It's because I'm talking, but mostly because I'm staring or not doing much.2019
• Erratum for
  Alertness and cognitive control: Is there a spatial attention constraint?2019
• Erratum for
  Processing without noticing in inattentional blindness: A replication of Moore and Egeth (1997) and Mack and Rock (1998).2019
• Erratum for
  The relationship between task difficulty and motor performance complexity.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract