Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30790123›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2019

Environmental Risk Perceptions and Community Health: Arsenic, Air Pollution, and Threats to Traditional Values of the Hopi Tribe.

Brian Mayer, Lorencita Joshweseoma, Gregory Sehongva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Native and Indigenous Populations and Gastric Cancer: A Worldwide Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Drinking water and health assessment in a Northern Arizona community.Human and ecological risk assessment : HERA · 2023
    Article
  4. Does Individuals' Perception of Wastewater Pollution Decrease Their Self-Rated Health? Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian MayerSchool of Sociology, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210027, Tucson, AZ, 87521, USA. brianmayer@email.arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9492-2326
Lorencita JoshweseomaHopi Department of Health & Human Services, P.O. Box 123, Kykotsmovi, AZ, 86039, USA.
Gregory SehongvaHopi Department of Health & Human Services, P.O. Box 123, Kykotsmovi, AZ, 86039, USA.

Funding

Project 2: Cumulative Environmental Effects: Expanding research with Hopi TribeP50ES026089 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BURGESS, JEFFEREY L. · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
EPA R836151EPA R836151C002NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES026089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American Indian and Alaska Native populations experience chronic disparities in a wide range of health outcomes, many of which are associated with disproportionate exposures to environmental health hazards. In the American Southwest, many indigenous tribes experience challenges in securing access to sustainable and safe sources of drinking water, limiting air pollution emissions on and off tribal lands, and cleaning up hazardous contaminants left over from a legacy of natural resource extraction. To better understand how households perceive the risk of exposure to potential environmental health risks, we conducted six focus groups organized by age and geographic location on the Hopi reservation. Focus group participants (n = 41) were asked to reflect on changes in their natural and manmade environment and how their health might be influenced by any potential changes. By investigating these environmental risk perceptions, we were able to identify arsenic in drinking water and indoor air quality as significant exposures of concern. These risk perceptions were frequently anchored in personal and familial experiences with health problems such as cancer and asthma. Older focus group participants identified ongoing shifts away from tradition and cultural practices as increasing environmental health risks. Similar to other communities economically dependent on the extraction of natural resources, focus group participants described the need for behavioral modifications regarding environmental health risks rather than eliminating the sources of potential health risks entirely. Our results suggest the need for including traditional values and practices in future interventions to reduce environmental health risks.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAir PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorArsenicDrinking WaterHumansIndians, North AmericanArsenicDrinking WaterAir pollutionAmerican Indian and Native AlaskanArsenicEnvironmental healthFocus groupsRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID30790123
PMCPMC8506934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.