ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2019
Unique Considerations for Special Populations in Episodic Migraine: the Underserved.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evolving Definition of Underserved Populations in Headache Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 2- Tension-type headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Inflammation Factors Mediate Association of Muscle Mass and Migraine: NHANES 1999-2004 and Mendelian Randomization.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Unique Considerations in Episodic Migraine: Underserved Populations.Current pain and headache reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPeople with migraine disease face many challenges, and these challenges can be magnified when someone is part of an "underserved" population. We set out to examine various categories of "underserved" populations, consider the unique challenges faced by these groups, and discuss mechanisms to mitigate these challenges as much as possible. RECENT
findingsVery little research has been performed to specifically evaluate underserved populations related to people with migraine disease. Recent research has shown the overall limitations of limited numbers of physicians with specialty training in headache disorders, and the socioeconomic implications of migraine disease have long been reported. Even the definition of "underserved" is not completely clear. We undertook to define this concept in the setting of migraine disease, breaking into different categories, including financial, geographic, and cultural/racial. Each underserved population has both shared and unique challenges, and in reality, given the paucity of medical expertise throughout the United States, one could make the argument that nearly all people with migraine disease are at risk for being underserved. In the future, epidemiologic as well as therapeutic research should incorporate analyses of these and any other underserved population to improve the application of study results across broad and varied populations whose commonality, in many cases, ends with sharing the same disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.