Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30790046›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results.

Masillamany Sivasanker, Ashwin Desouza, Manish Bhandare, Vikram Chaudhari, Mahesh Goel, Shailesh V Shrikhande

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05939063 (Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatosplecnectomy in Selected Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05939063 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatosplecnectomy in Selected Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2023 to 2028Enrolled160ConditionsLeft-sided Pancreatic CancerArmsLRAMPS, LDP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidence and risk factors for Chyle leak after pancreatic surgery for cancer: A comprehensive systematic review.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masillamany SivasankerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
Ashwin DesouzaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Manish BhandareDepartment of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Vikram ChaudhariDepartment of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Mahesh GoelDepartment of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Shailesh V ShrikhandeDepartment of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. shailushrikhande@hotmail.com.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INJawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been propagated as the standard of care for pancreatic cancers involving the body and tail of the pancreas. This procedure has been shown to have promising results in enhancing the microscopically negative tangential resection margins as well as the lymph node yield.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database on the resections performed for all pancreatic body and tail tumors at Tata Memorial Centre.

resultsSixty-five patients underwent RAMPS without any perioperative mortality. The various pathologies comprised of adenocarcinoma (41.5%), neuroendocrine tumors (12.3%), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (15.3%), cystic neoplasms (15.2%), etc. The R0 resection rate was 87.7%. Among this cohort, 27 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The 3-year OS and DFS for distal pancreatic cancers were 56% and 38%, respectively, but 3-year OS and DFS for other distal pancreatic tumors were 97% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R0 resection significantly improved disease-free survival (p = 0.023) for pancreatic cancer.

conclusionRAMPS procedure aids to achieve high negative tangential margins for all tumors involving the body and tail of the pancreas and not just pancreatic cancer in isolation. Since preoperative histologic diagnosis is not routinely indicated and also a number of other distal pancreatic tumors carry a relatively better prognosis compared with pancreatic cancer, our results provide further evidence that RAMPS should be considered as the procedure of choice for all operable tumors involving body and tail of the pancreas.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAgedAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsDistal pancreatosplenectomyPancreatic tumorsRadical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID30790046
OpenAlexW2915287986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.