Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30790025›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA.

Maximilian T Löffler, Alina Jacob, Alexander Valentinitsch, Anna Rienmüller, Claus Zimmer, Yu-Mi Ryang, Thomas Baum, Jan S Kirschke

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CT image-based biomarkers for opportunistic screening of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. The correlation between osteoporotic vertebrae fracture risk and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Multi-center validation of automated CT-based L1 vertebral Hounsfield unit.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Thoracolumbar vertebral bone quality (TLVBQ) score as a possible screening tool for osteoporosis in patients with severe degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  11. The predictive value of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for adjacent segment degeneration following single-level anterior cervical fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Intramuscular fat infiltration is associated with higher vertebral void space burden and lower volumetric bone mineral density in older adults.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative CT Models to Compare Density Patterns Across Pelvic Fractures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maximilian T LöfflerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. m_loeffler@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-3682
Alina JacobDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Alexander ValentinitschDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Anna RienmüllerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Yu-Mi RyangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas BaumDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 637164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare opportunistic quantitative CT (QCT) with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their ability to predict incident vertebral fractures.

methodsWe included 84 patients aged 50 years and older, who had routine CT including the lumbar spine and DXA within a 12-month period (baseline) as well as follow-up imaging after at least 12 months or who sustained an incident vertebral fracture documented earlier. Patients with bone disorders aside from osteoporosis were excluded. Fracture status and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively evaluated in baseline CT and fracture status was reassessed at follow-up. BMD

resultsSixteen patients had incident vertebral fractures showing lower mean BMD

conclusionsOpportunistic screening of mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients in CT performed for indications other than densitometry allows for better risk assessment of imminent vertebral fractures than dedicated DXA. KEY POINTS: • Opportunistic QCT predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures better than DXA reference standard in mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients. • More than every second patient (56%) with an incident vertebral fracture was misdiagnosed not having osteoporosis according to DXA. • Standard ACR QCT-cutoff values for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedBone DensityBone Diseases, MetabolicCalibrationFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRetrospective StudiesSpinal FracturesBone densityMultidetector computed tomographyOsteoporosisPhoton absorptiometrySpinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID30790025
PMCPMC6682570
OpenAlexW2917426823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.