Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30789938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?

Taina Leinonen, Svetlana Solovieva, Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Mikko Laaksonen, Eira Viikari-Juntura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taina LeinonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Svetlana SolovievaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Kirsti Husgafvel-PursiainenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko LaaksonenFinnish Centre for Pensions, Helsinki, Finland.
Eira Viikari-JunturaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding diverse labor market trajectories around vocational rehabilitation provides important insight into potential effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts. We examined factors associated with work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation.

methodsUsing nationwide Finnish register data of 7180 vocational rehabilitees, we constructed latent trajectory groups of work participation two years before and two years after their rehabilitation episode starting in 2008-2010. We plotted changes in labor market statuses in these groups and examined other associated factors using multinomial logistic regression.

resultsWe identified four trajectories based on work participation levels before and after vocational rehabilitation. The "High-Resumed" group (35.6%) typically returned to full duties. The "High-to-Negligible" group (20.7%) typically transitioned to full disability retirement or unemployment. Among the "Medium-Resumed" (25.5%) and "Longstanding Negligible" (18.3%) groups, work disability and unemployment were common before rehabilitation, but afterwards those assigned to the former group often returned to full or partial duties. Overall, older age, male gender, living in areas with lower employment rates, having lower education, being employed in the private sector, and having mental diagnoses were associated with the other three trajectories than the most favorable "High-Resumed" trajectory. Furthermore, certain industrial sectors, job exposures, and less common diagnoses further separated specific trajectories.

conclusionsWork participation trajectories around vocational rehabilitation are diverse, only partly dependent on initial levels of work participation, and determined by various individual and work-related factors. Future nationwide studies should assess the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation taking into consideration both individual and work-related factors.

Indexed as

Rehabilitation, VocationalAdultAge FactorsEducational StatusEmploymentFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupationsPersons with DisabilitiesRetirementReturn to WorkSex FactorsUnemployment

Identifiers

PMID30789938
PMCPMC6383888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.