Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30789873›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Effect of 3D Printing Individualized Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Plantar Biomechanics and Pain in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rui Xu, Zhonghan Wang, Tingjian Ma, Zhenxiao Ren, Hui Jin

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Efficacy of 3D-Printed Insoles in Managing Common Foot Conditions: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui XuNorman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Zhonghan WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Tingjian MaDepartment of Pain, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Zhenxiao RenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Hui JinDepartment of Pain, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNFirst Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Traditional ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are not effective in treating plantar fasciitis, while customized 3-dimensional (3D) printed ankle-foot orthoses are effective in treating many ankle-foot diseases. This study investigated the effects of customized 3D printed AFOs on biomechanics and comfort of the plantar foot in plantar fasciitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty patients with bilateral plantar fasciitis aged 31-60 years participated in this study. At week 0, patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: the control group consisting of those wearing separate shoes with prefabricated AFOs; and the experimental group consisting of those wearing a separate shoe and customized 3D-printed AFO. The Footscan® system recorded maximum pressure, maximum strength, and contact area of patients' hallux, toes 2-5, first to fifth metatarsal, midfoot, lateral heel, and midfoot heel at weeks 0 and 8. Patients used visual analogue scale scores at weeks 0 and 8 to assess overall comfort of foot orthosis, to determine the credibility and comfort of both orthopedic insole conditions. RESULTS At week 0, in the experimental group, peak pressure in the hallux and first metatarsal area was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05), while mid-heel and lateral heel peak pressures were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). After 8 weeks, all groups reported more comfort compared with the same group in week 0 (P<0.05). The comfort scores reported by the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study supports the efficiency of customized 3D printing AFO for reducing damage associated with plantar lesions and improving comfort in patients with plantar fasciitis compared with prefabricated AFO. Customized AFO is useful in the treatment of plantar fasciitis compared with prefabricated AFOs.

Indexed as

AdultAnkleEquipment DesignFasciitis, PlantarFemaleFootFoot OrthosesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient-Specific ModelingPressurePrinting, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID30789873
PMCPMC6394143
OpenAlexW2915822009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.