Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30789761›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of public health2019

The Affordable Care Act and Access to Care for Reproductive-Aged and Pregnant Women in the United States, 2010-2016.

Jamie R Daw, Benjamin D Sommers

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An exploration of barriers to access to healthcare in Hancock County, Tennessee: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Addressing Maternal and Child Health Disparities Through Perinatal Home Visiting.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie R DawJamie R. Daw is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Benjamin D. Sommers is with the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Benjamin D SommersJamie R. Daw is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Benjamin D. Sommers is with the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the association between the Affordable Care Act (ACA), health insurance coverage, and access to care among reproductive-aged and pregnant women.

methodsWe performed an observational study comparing current insurance type, cost-related barriers to medical care, and no usual source of care among reproductive-aged (n = 128 352) and pregnant (n = 2179) female respondents to the National Health Interview Survey in the United States, before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2016) the ACA coverage expansions.

resultsAmong reproductive-aged women, the ACA was associated with a 7.4 percentage-point decrease in the probability of uninsurance (95% confidence interval [CI] = -8.6, -6.2), a 3.6 percentage-point increase in Medicaid (95% CI = 2.5, 4.7), and a 3.1 percentage-point increase in nongroup private coverage (95% CI = 2.1, 4.1). The ACA was also associated with a 1.5 percentage-point decline in cost-related barriers to medical care (95% CI = -2.6, -0.5) and a 2.4 percentage-point reduction in lacking a usual source of care (95% CI = -4.5, -0.3). We did not find significant changes in insurance or cost-related barriers to care for pregnant women.

conclusionsThe ACA was associated with expanded insurance coverage and improvements in access to care for women of reproductive age, particularly for those with lower incomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMedicaidMedically UninsuredPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPovertyPregnancyUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30789761
PMCPMC6417599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.