ReviewCardiovascular research2019
Completing the genetic spectrum influencing coronary artery disease: from germline to somatic variation.
Review in Cardiovascular research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knockdown of ADAMDEC1 ameliorates ox-LDL-induced endothelial cell injury and atherosclerosis progression.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- [Influence of clonal hematopoiesis on non-hematological diseases and aging processes].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis, Arterial Hypertension, and Coronary Artery Disease.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of coronary artery disease and pneumonia identifies shared immune pathways.Science advances · 2022Article
- A New Murine Model of Clonal Hematopoiesis InvestigatesJACC. Basic to translational science · 2019Article
- Inflammation: a common contributor to cancer, aging, and cardiovascular diseases-expanding the concept of cardio-oncology.Cardiovascular research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic and environmental factors influence the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Genetic analyses of families and the population continue to yield important fundamental insights for CAD. For the past four decades, CAD human genetic research focused largely on the study of germline genetic variation in CAD and its risk factors. The first genes associated with CAD were discovered using basic Mendelian principles and pedigree analysis. Mapping of the human genome and advancement in sequencing technology sparked further discovery of novel genetic associations through exome sequencing and genome wide association analysis in increasingly larger populations. While prior work implicated in situ DNA damage as a feature of atherosclerosis, more recently, somatic mutagenesis in and clonal expansion of haematopoietic stem cells was found to influence risk of CAD. Mutations observed for this condition, termed clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, frequently occur within epigenetic regulator genes (e.g. DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, etc.), which are also implicated in leukaemogenesis. Hypercholesterolaemic mice with Tet2 bone marrow deficiency are predisposed to the development of atherosclerosis that may be partly related to inflammatory cytokines. As the genetic basis of CAD expands from the germline to somatic genome, our fundamental understanding of CAD continues to evolve; these new discoveries represent new opportunities for risk prediction and prevention, and a new facet of cardio-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.