Trial reportJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2019
Role of Biomechanical Factors in Resolution of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Among a Population of Workers.
Trial report in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a scoping review of causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, and intervention strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Blocking CTGF/CCN2 reverses neural fibrosis and sensorimotor declines in a rat model of overuse-induced median mononeuropathy.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIdentify if Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms vary by measured biomechanical exposures.
methodsA nested prospective cohort within a large, multicenter, 8-year cohort study. The CTS case definition was tingling/numbness in 2+ median nerve-served digits plus a nerve conduction study consistent with CTS. Workers were assigned to: (1) low (strain index [SI] less than or equal to 6.1), and (2) high (SI more than 6.1) job groups.
resultsAmong 1201 workers, 106 had CTS. Those in the high SI group became and remained symptom-free for at least 3 months, faster than the low SI group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21 to 3.56, P = 0.008). Only surgical release trended towards resolving CTS. Light duty had no impact, and job change was associated with delayed symptoms resolution.
conclusionsHigh biomechanical exposures paradoxically predicted faster improvement in CTS and light duty did not result in symptom resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.