Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30789349›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Breast Cancer Survivors' Experiences With an Activity Tracker Integrated Into a Supervised Exercise Program: Qualitative Study.

Hoi San Wu, Roxanne Gal, Niek C van Sleeuwen, Aarnout C Brombacher, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Anne M May, Evelyn M Monninkhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hoi San WuHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-4461
Roxanne GalJulius Center of Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-4581
Niek C van SleeuwenSystematic Change Group, Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1495-4326
Aarnout C BrombacherSystematic Change Group, Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-6291
Wijnand A IJsselsteijnHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-9269
Anne M MayJulius Center of Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-8189
Evelyn M MonninkhofJulius Center of Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-7605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing evidence that physical activity is related to a better prognosis after a breast cancer diagnosis, whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse outcomes. It is therefore important to stimulate physical activity and reduce sedentary time among patients with breast cancer. Activity trackers offer a new opportunity for interventions directed at stimulating physical activity behavior change.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the experience of patients with breast cancer who used an activity tracker in addition to a supervised exercise intervention in the randomized UMBRELLA Fit trial.

methodsA total of 10 patients with breast cancer who completed cancer treatment participated in semistructured in-depth interviews about their experience with and suggestions for improvements for the Jawbone UP2 activity tracker.

resultsThe activity tracker motivated women to be physically active and created more awareness of their (sedentary) lifestyles. The women indicated that the automatically generated advice (received via the Jawbone UP app) lacked individualization and was not applicable to their personal situations (ie, having been treated for cancer). Furthermore, women felt that the daily step goal was one-dimensional, and they preferred to incorporate other physical activity goals. The activity tracker's inability to measure strength exercises was a noted shortcoming. Finally, women valued personal feedback about the activity tracker from the physiotherapist.

conclusionsWearing an activity tracker raised lifestyle awareness in patients with breast cancer. The women also reported additional needs not addressed by the system. Potential improvements include a more realistic total daily physical activity representation, personalized advice, and personalized goals.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsExercise TherapyFemaleFitness TrackersHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSedentary BehaviorSurvivorsactivity trackersbreast cancerphysical activityqualitative researchsedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID30789349
PMCPMC6403530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.