Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788839›Full record

Trial reportDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2019

Effectiveness of audit and feedback in addressing over prescribing of antibiotics and injectable medicines in a middle-income country: an RCT.

Fatemeh Soleymani, Arash Rashidian, Mostafa Hosseini, Rassoul Dinarvand, Abbas Kebriaeezade, Mohammad Abdollahi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Audit and Feedback Interventions for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatemeh SoleymaniNo.2-440, Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. fsolemani@yahoo.com.
Arash RashidianNo.2-440, Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa HosseiniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rassoul DinarvandPharmaceutical Management & Economics Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas KebriaeezadeNo.2-440, Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AbdollahiDepartment of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences 90-03-33-14661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overprescribing of antibiotics and injectable medicines is common in ambulatory care in many low- and middleincome countries. We evaluated the effects of three different interventions in improving physician prescribing. We conducted a four-armed randomized controlled trial with one-month and three- months follow-up. General physicians, pediatricians, and infectious disease specialists were included in this study if they had an outpatient office in Tehran, Iran. The study involved two behaviorally guided interventions: "new-design audit and feedback (NA&F)"; "printed educational material (PEM)" and an existing intervention of "routinely conducted audit and feedback (RA&F)". The theoretical framework underpinning the intervention was the theory of planned behavior. Main outcome measures were the percentage change in the proportion of prescriptions containing injectable dexamethasone; oral amoxicillin and cefixime. NA&F reduced the proportion of prescriptions particularly those containing dexamethasone injectable and cefixime (1.64, 0.99 absolute percentage change, p = 0.006, p = 0.01 respectively). PEM reduced the proportion of prescriptions containing cefixime (0.93 absolute percentage change p = 0.04). Other primary outcomes had no significant differences. A secondary outcome measure showed overall prescribing of injectables also reduced (absolute risk reduction: 3%). Overally, the study provides strong evidence that using theoretical insights in the development of the intervention improved prescribing behavior that lasted at least three months after the intervention. The design, format, and presentation of messages in feedback forms significantly influence the impact of audit and feedback on physician prescribing. While the interventions were effective, the impacts on inappropriate prescribing were modest and limited. In settings with rampant problems of overprescribing, intensive interventions are required to substantially improve prescribing patterns. Graphical abstract Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAmbulatory CareAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiximeDexamethasoneFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInappropriate PrescribingInjectionsIranMaleMedical AuditOutcome Assessment, Health CarePediatriciansAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiximeDexamethasoneEffectiveness of audit and feedbackPhysician’s prescribing indicatorsRational medicine use interventions

Identifiers

PMID30788839
PMCPMC6593028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.