Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788693›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2019

Those Who Disappear and Those Who Say Goodbye: Patterns of Attrition in Long-Term Home Visiting.

Colleen E Janczewski, Joshua P Mersky, Michael J Brondino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colleen E JanczewskiHelen Bader School of Social Welfare at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2400 E. Hartford Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. janczew2@uwm.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0724-7332
Joshua P MerskyHelen Bader School of Social Welfare at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2400 E. Hartford Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Michael J BrondinoHelen Bader School of Social Welfare at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2400 E. Hartford Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.

Funding

HRSA HHS 1X10MC29512-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most evidence-based home visiting models are designed to support families from pregnancy through a child's second birthday, though programs often struggle to retain families for this long. Previous research on client and program factors that predict attrition has produced mixed results, which may be partly because attrition is typically conceptualized as a homogeneous phenomenon. The current study sampled 991 women who received home visiting services from one of 26 agencies in a statewide network of evidence-based programs. Participants who remained in services were compared to three types of early leavers: those who communicated their intent to leave (active attrition), those whose cases closed due to non-participation (passive attrition), and those who moved from the service area. Within a year of enrollment, 42% of women exited services. Cox regression results suggested no differences in the timing of service exit among the three attrition types. Multinomial analyses revealed that, when compared to participants who remained in services, active leavers were more likely to be married or cohabitating, while passive leavers were more likely to be younger, African American, unemployed, and to have a home visitor with low job satisfaction. Participants who moved were less likely to be Latina and employed. An early pattern of inconsistent attendance was the strongest predictor of active and passive withdrawal. Rates of attrition varied by home visiting model, though inconsistent attendance was a robust predictor of passive attrition across models. This study underscores the need to scrutinize service duration as a metric of success in home visiting.

Indexed as

House CallsAdultEvidence-Based NursingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLong-Term CarePostnatal CarePregnancyAttritionEngagementHome visitingRetention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.