Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788685›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2019

A Review of the Management of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas in Young People: Is Surveillance Wasted on the Young?

Daniel Bushyhead, Otto S T Lin, Richard A Kozarek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Risk for Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Adenoma.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Case of Sporadic Multiple Colonic Polyps in a Young Woman.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel BushyheadDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356424, Seattle, WA, 98195-6424, USA.
Otto S T LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., C3-GAS, Mailstop H7-ID, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Richard A KozarekDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., C3-GAS, Mailstop H7-ID, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Richard.Kozarek@virginiamason.org.
Virginia Mason Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The national incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing in people younger than 50 years old. Although diagnostic colonoscopy is detecting more sporadic adenomas in young adults, there are no guidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance. The aim of this review was to survey the medical literature on the prevalence of sporadic adenomas in young adults, subsequent risk of metachronous neoplasia, and lastly to provide several concluding recommendations for clinical practice. We found that the prevalence of sporadic adenomas in young adults is greater than initially estimated and dependent upon factors such as colonoscopy indication and age. The incidence of metachronous colorectal neoplasia following polypectomy is unclear but does not appear to be greater than that of older adults. Risk factors for metachronous neoplasia include findings on index colonoscopy, male gender, smoking status, and certain medical comorbidities. Upon finding a colorectal adenoma in a young person, we suggest that a detailed family history be obtained to confirm that it is truly sporadic. Testing adenomas for evidence of Lynch syndrome is low yield. Strategies to inform surveillance intervals may include an assessment of risk factors for metachronous neoplasia, although surveillance intervals shorter than those recommended in current guidelines are not warranted. Future research should focus on obtaining long-term, prospective data on the incidence of metachronous neoplasia in diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdenomaAdultAgedAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceRisk AssessmentAdenomasColorectal cancerColorectal cancer screeningColorectal neoplasiaYoung patients

Identifiers

PMID30788685
OpenAlexW2915639584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.