Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788532›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Clinical value of FDG-PET/CT in bacteremia of unknown origin with catalase-negative gram-positive cocci or Staphylococcus aureus.

Mette Bordinggaard Brøndserud, Court Pedersen, Flemming S Rosenvinge, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Søren Hess

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Diagnostic Yield of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. In Vivo Detection ofInternational journal of biomedical imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic Performance ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2019
    Review
  13. An update on the role ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mette Bordinggaard BrøndserudDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Indgang 44, 46, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. mette@taulov-data.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-3944
Court PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 23, 3, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Flemming S RosenvingeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 21, 2, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Poul F Høilund-CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Indgang 44, 46, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Søren HessDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Indgang 44, 46, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBacteremia is associated with high mortality, especially when the site of infection is unknown. While conventional imaging usually focus on specific body parts, FDG-PET/CT visualizes hypermetabolic foci throughout the body. PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of FDG/PET-CT to detect the site of infection and its clinical impact in bacteremia of unknown origin with catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci (excluding pneumococci and enterococci) or Staphylococcus aureus (BUOCSA).

methodsWe retrospectively identified 157 patients with 165 episodes of BUOCSA, who subsequently underwent FDG-PET/CT. Data were collected from medical records. Decision regarding important sites of infection in patients with bacteremia was based on the entire patient course and served as reference diagnosis for comparison with FDG-PET/CT findings. FDG-PET/CT was considered to have high clinical impact if it correctly revealed site(s) of infection in areas not assessed by other imaging modalities or if other imaging modalities were negative/equivocal in these areas, or if it established a new clinically relevant diagnosis, and/or led to change in antimicrobial treatment.

resultsFDG-PET/CT detected sites of infection in 56.4% of cases and had high clinical impact in 47.3%. It was the first imaging modality to identify sites of infection in 41.1% bacteremia cases, led to change of antimicrobial therapy in 14.7%, and established a new diagnosis unrelated to bacteremia in 9.8%. Detection rate and clinical impact were not significantly influenced by duration of antimicrobial treatment preceding FDG-PET/CT, days from suspicion of bacteremia to FDG-PET/CT-scan, type of bacteremia, or cancer.

conclusionFDG-PET/CT appears clinically useful in BUOCSA. Prospective studies are warranted for confirmation.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsBacteremiaCatalaseFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gram-Positive BacteriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReference ValuesAnti-Infective AgentsCatalaseFluorodeoxyglucose F18BacteremiaFDGHumansNuclear medicinePositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30788532
OpenAlexW2915242557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.