Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788201›Full record

ReviewCureus2018

Second Re-irradiation of Brain Metastases: A Review of Studies Involving Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Carsten Nieder, Rosalba Yobuta, Bård Mannsåker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Automatically tracking brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for locally recurrent brain metastases after initial SRT and characteristics of target population.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carsten NiederOncology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, NOR.
Rosalba YobutaOncology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, NOR.
Bård MannsåkerOncology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, NOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to advances in the systemic and local treatment, e.g., targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and stereotactic radiotherapy, an increasing proportion of patients with brain metastases now survive for several years. However, long-term survival is not synonymous to permanent local control in the brain. Both local and distant brain relapse sometimes necessitate additional radiotherapy to prevent death from neurologic causes. Prescribing more than two courses of radiotherapy to the same target volume or, in this case, brain metastasis, is a controversial approach. The present review summarizes the results of clinical studies, that included patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and two courses of stereotactic radiotherapy to the same, locally recurrent metastasis, and with two courses of WBRT and an additional stereotactic radiotherapy.

Indexed as

brain metastaseslocal controlradiation therapyradionecrosisrecurrent brain metastasesre-irradiationstereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30788201
PMCPMC6373883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.