Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788166›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2019

A phase I trial of Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases.

Joseph I Kang, Daniel C Sufficool, Chung-Tsen Hsueh, Andrew J Wroe, Baldev Patyal, Mark E Reeves, Jerry D Slater, Gary Y Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01697371 (Phase I-II Trial of Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for Patients With Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01697371 narecruitingnot on this map

Phase I-II Trial of Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for Patients With Liver Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2012 to 2033Enrolled35ConditionsLiver MetastasesArmsProton, Proton Radiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Proton Beam Therapy in Liver Malignancies.Current oncology reports · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph I KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Daniel C SufficoolDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Chung-Tsen HsuehDepartment of Medical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Andrew J WroeDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Baldev PatyalDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mark E ReevesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Jerry D SlaterDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gary Y YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases in anticipation of a subsequent phase II study.

methodsAn institutional IRB approved phase I clinical trial was conducted. Eligible patients had 1-3 liver metastases measuring less than 5 cm, and no metastases location within 2 cm of the GI tract. Dose escalation was conducted with three dose cohorts. The low, intermediate, and high dose cohorts were planned to receive 36, 48, and 60 respectively to the internal target volume (ITV) in 3 fractions. At least 700 mL of normal liver had to receive <15. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included acute grade 3 liver, intestinal or spinal cord toxicity or any grade 4 toxicity. The MTD is defined as the dose level below that which results in DLT in 2 or more of the 6 patients in the highest dose level cohort.

resultsNine patients were enrolled (6 male, 3 female): median age 64 years (range, 33-77 years); median gross tumor volume (GTV) 11.1 mL (range, 2.14-89.3 mL); most common primary site, colorectal (5 patients). Four patients had multiple tumors. No patient experienced a DLT and dose was escalated to 60 in 3 fractions without reaching MTD. The only toxicity within 90 days of completion of treatment was one patient with a grade 1 skin hyperpigmentation without tenderness or desquamation. Two patients in the low dose cohort had local recurrence and repeat SBRT was done to previously treated lesions without any toxicities.

conclusionsBiologically ablative Proton SBRT doses are well tolerated in patients with limited liver metastases with no patients experiencing any grade 2+ acute toxicity. Results from this trial provide the grounds for an ongoing phase II Proton SBRT study of 60 over 3 fractions for liver metastases.

Indexed as

liver metastasesmaximum tolerated dose (MTD)Phase Iproton therapystereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Identifiers

PMID30788166
PMCPMC6351312
OpenAlexW2889974110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.