Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788143›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2019

An evolutionary compass for detecting signals of polygenic selection and mutational bias.

Lawrence H Uricchio, Hugo C Kitano, Alexander Gusev, Noah A Zaitlen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genotype-by-environment interactions and local adaptation shape selection in the US National Chip Processing Trial.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence H UricchioDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford CA.
Hugo C KitanoDepartment of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford CA.
Alexander GusevDana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA.
Noah A ZaitlenDepartment of Medicine University of California San Francisco CA.
Stanford University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG006399 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PRICE, ALKES L · 2011 to 2024
$6.3M
Population genetics for large-scale sequencing studies of diverse populationsR01HG005855 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Noah Rosenberg, Paul A Scheet · 2010 to 2026
$5.8M
Optimizing imputation for diverse populations in a distributed frameworkU01HG009080 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KENNY, EIMEAR ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
A Stanford - SJSU Postdoctoral Training Program to Enhance URM TeachingK12GM088033 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTHROYD, JOHN C · 2010 to 2016
$4.1M
Richer Models of Asthma Risk: Bridging the Environment-Genetics DivideK25HL121295 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZAITLEN, NOAH A · 2014 to 2018
$784k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005855NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006399NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009080NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL121295NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM088033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection and mutation shape the genetic variation underlying human traits, but the specific evolutionary mechanisms driving complex trait variation are largely unknown. We developed a statistical method that uses polarized genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from a single population to detect signals of mutational bias and selection. We found evidence for nonneutral signals on variation underlying several traits (body mass index [BMI], schizophrenia, Crohn's disease, educational attainment, and height). We then used simulations that incorporate simultaneous negative and positive selection to show that these signals are consistent with mutational bias and shifts in the fitness-phenotype relationship, but not stabilizing selection or mutational bias alone. We additionally replicate two of our top three signals (BMI and educational attainment) in an external cohort, and show that population stratification may have confounded GWAS summary statistics for height in the GIANT cohort. Our results provide a flexible and powerful framework for evolutionary analysis of complex phenotypes in humans and other species, and offer insights into the evolutionary mechanisms driving variation in human polygenic traits.

Indexed as

Complex traitsmutation biasnatural selectionpolygenic selection

Identifiers

PMID30788143
PMCPMC6369964
OpenAlexW2953318985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.