Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788124›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2019

Clinical significance of colorectal polyp detection on colonoscopy insertion.

Taku Sakamoto, Raji Ramaraj, Yutaka Tomizawa, Hourin Cho, Takahisa Matsuda, Yutaka Saito

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Taku SakamotoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Raji RamarajDepartment of Gastroenterology University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK.
Yutaka TomizawaDivision of Gastroenterology Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle USA.
Hourin ChoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahisa MatsudaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPUniversity Hospital Llandough · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal lesions are generally evaluated during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy. Minimising the risk of missed lesions is crucial to determine an appropriate future surveillance colonoscopy interval. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of detecting sigmoid colon lesions during the insertion phase. Methods: This retrospective study included 172 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy between October 2017 and April 2018. The total number of detected polyps, mean polyps per procedure, mean polyps per positive procedure, and histological and clinical characteristics of detected lesions were recorded. The primary endpoint was the difference in sigmoid colon polyp detection rates during insertion and withdrawal. Results: A total of 172 colonoscopies were performed for each patient and 322 lesions were detected. Sixty-two (19%) polyps were detected during insertion, 312 (97%) during withdrawal, and 52 (16%) during both insertion and withdrawal. Although all polyps except for those in the sigmoid colon could be detected during withdrawal, 10 of 87 (11%) polyps in the sigmoid colon could only be detected during insertion. Conclusions: In this study, attempts to detect polyps, even in the insertion phase, showed the clinical significance to decrease the risk of missed adenomatous polyps in the sigmoid colon.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdenomatous PolypsAgedColonic PolypsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesColorectal polypinsertion phasesigmoid colon

Identifiers

PMID30788124
PMCPMC6374853
OpenAlexW2896464460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.