Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30788121›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2019

Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Elia Armellini, Erminia Manfrin, Elena Trisolini, Silvano Andorno, Marco Ballarè, Laura Bernardoni, Renzo Luciano Boldorini, Armando Gabbrielli, Luca Frulloni, Alberto Larghi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elia ArmelliniDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital, Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8810-3597
Erminia ManfrinDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5706-0018
Elena TrisoliniDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont 'Amedeo Avogadro', Novara, Italy.
Silvano AndornoDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont 'Amedeo Avogadro', Novara, Italy.
Marco BallarèDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Laura BernardoniGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Renzo Luciano BoldoriniDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont 'Amedeo Avogadro', Novara, Italy.
Armando GabbrielliGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Luca FrulloniGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Alberto LarghiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Pietro OcchipintiDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Stefano Francesco CrinòGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Innovative approaches to improve diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) have focused on needle design with development of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles with microcore-acquisition technology. Recently, a 20-gauge (20G) antegrade-cutting-side-bevelled biopsy needle (ProCore®) was developed for EUS-TA, but data about its diagnostic performance and histological capability are scant. Objectives: We assessed the diagnostic performance and histologic retrieval rate of a new 20G antegrade-cutting-side-bevelled biopsy needle compared with a 22G reverse-side-bevelled needle for EUS sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of 238 consecutively collected patients who underwent EUS-TA using a 20G or a 22G ProCore® needle, without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), was conducted at two centres.Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Histologic tissue retrieval was evaluated applying a scoring system for each case. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 98.4-100% in the 20G-, and 94.9-100% in the 22G-needle groups, respectively ( Conclusions: Both side-bevelled FNB needles achieved a high diagnostic sensitivity. The 20G-side-bevelled needle obtained a significantly higher microcore retrieval rate.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationAgedEndosonographyFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic DiseasesPancreatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and Specificity20G ProCore®endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisitionEndosonographyfine-needle biopsy (FNB)pancreatic cancersolid pancreatic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID30788121
PMCPMC6374840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.