ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019
Different sliding mechanics in space closure of lingual orthodontics: a translational study by three-dimensional finite element method.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Slot fidelity and ligation-dependent tribology in personalized brackets made by casting versus selective laser melting: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of lingual versus labial orthodontics on patient comfort and treatment efficiency.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Numerical Simulation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction Utilizing Power Arms in Lingual Orthodontic Technique.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Force changes associated with differential activation of en-masse retraction and/or intrusion with clear aligners.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lingual orthodontics have become popular in modern society as they do not cause aesthetic impairment. From the translational medicine point of view, the use of biomechanical analysis to solve a clinical problem has rarely been reported. Here, we combined the clinical trial and 3-D finite element (FE) method to translate the clinical problem to the FE analysis and back to clinic. Twenty upper premolar extraction cases treated with customized lingual appliances were recruited in this study. Cephalometric films and cast records analysis showed that the "bowing effect", which is a major side effect in lingual orthodontics, occurred during the first treatment stage with single lingual cable retraction. In order to translate the problem to biomechanical research, we introduced the 3-D finite element (FE) model of a customized lingual orthodontic system. The 3-D FE model including the maxilla, periodontal ligament (PDL), and dentition was constructed from human computed tomography data. The tendency of tooth movements in three dimensions and stress distribution in the PDL were analyzed by different mechanical loading methods. 3-D FE analysis confirmed the "bowing effects" and unexpected tooth movements with application of single lingual retraction force. Interestingly, we found that applying forces on both buccal and lingual sides, called "double cable" mechanics, could prevent the "bowing effect". For the clinical trial, we applied the "double cable" force during space closure stage for 4 months, and confirmed "double cable" mechanics could correct and prevent the "bowing effect" clinically. Based on our results, both buccal and lingual forces should be used during space closure in lingual orthodontics to prevent and correct the "bowing effect". Moreover, the magnitude of buccal force should not be lower than the force on the lingual side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30787973PMC6357325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.