ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling local dependencies in accuracy and speed: A mixture hierarchical modeling approach.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Dependent latent class partial credit models for careless and insufficient effort responding in online survey data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Joint partial credit and time model.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Beyond the overt response: Reaction time modeling in self-report surveys across administration modes and item formats.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Perception of audio-visual synchrony is modulated by walking speed and step-cycle phase.Perception · 2026Article
- Effects of social exclusion on following the gaze of others.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Joint analysis of dispersed count-time data using a bivariate latent factor model.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026Article
- Static Estimation of Vista-Space Egocentric Distance with Iterative Feedback: A Cognitive-Perceptual Task.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Response-time process signals for selective escalation in reduced-item mental health symptom screening.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cereblon-related mild intellectual disability disrupts response inhibition and uniformity of group-individual strategies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Early acquisition efficiency in visual-to-auditory sensory substitution: the role of structured learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An Experimental Study on the Impact of Survey Stakes on Response Inconsistency in Mixed-Worded Scales.Educational and psychological measurement · 2025Article
- A sparse latent class model incorporating response times.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025Article
- Optimizing the Color Shapes Task for Ambulatory Assessment and Drift Diffusion Modeling: A Factorial Experiment.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Digital questionnaire response time (DQRT): A ubiquitous and low-cost digital assay of cognitive processing speed.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Exploratory General-Response Cognitive Diagnostic Models with Higher-Order Structures.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the Predictive Performance of Process Data and Result Data in Complex Problem Solving Using the Conditional Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Measuring Cognitive Function and Cognitive Decline With Response Time Data in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Response times (RTs) are a natural kind of data to investigate cognitive processes underlying cognitive test performance. We give an overview of modeling approaches and of findings obtained with these approaches. Four types of models are discussed: response time models (RT as the sole dependent variable), joint models (RT together with other variables as dependent variable), local dependency models (with remaining dependencies between RT and accuracy), and response time as covariate models (RT as independent variable). The evidence from these approaches is often not very informative about the specific kind of processes (other than problem solving, information accumulation, and rapid guessing), but the findings do suggest dual processing: automated processing (e.g., knowledge retrieval) vs. controlled processing (e.g., sequential reasoning steps), and alternative explanations for the same results exist. While it seems well-possible to differentiate rapid guessing from normal problem solving (which can be based on automated or controlled processing), further decompositions of response times are rarely made, although possible based on some of model approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.