Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787644›Full record

ArticleJournal of blood medicine2019

Cost for sickle cell disease screening using isoelectric focusing with dried blood spot samples and estimation of price thresholds for a point-of-care test in Uganda.

Mercy Mvundura, Charles Kiyaga, Mutsumi Metzler, Carol Kamya, Jeanette M Lim, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Patricia S Coffey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mercy MvunduraDevices and Tools Global Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA, pcoffey@path.org.
Charles KiyagaUganda Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Mutsumi MetzlerDevices and Tools Global Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA, pcoffey@path.org.
Carol KamyaEvaluation Projects, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Jeanette M LimDevices and Tools Global Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA, pcoffey@path.org.
Catherine Maiteki-SebuguziIndependent Consultant, Kampala, Uganda.
Patricia S CoffeyDevices and Tools Global Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA, pcoffey@path.org.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration · UGMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification through newborn screening is the first step in active management of sickle cell disease (SCD). Uganda currently screens newborns and infants under 2 years for SCD in high HIV-burden districts using isoelectric focusing with dried blood spot samples. Our analysis sought to estimate the costs per child screened for SCD using this method in Uganda and then to use those data to estimate the price threshold for screening with a point-of-care (POC) test.

methodsWe estimated the financial and economic costs per child screened for SCD using data from health facilities and the Central Public Health Laboratory. These costs included sample collection, transportation, and laboratory processing. Price thresholds for a POC test were estimated using two scenarios.

resultsThe price threshold of an SCD POC test used for diagnosis would be $3.77 when taking into account only financial costs and $5.14 when taking into account economic costs. Thresholds for a POC test used for screening would be $3.07-$3.51 and $4.38-$5.09, respectively, depending on test specificity.

conclusionThe price threshold of a POC test for SCD will depend on the assumptions on how it will be used - either as a screening or diagnostic test. If used for screening, test specificity will have significant impact. Results from this type of costing study can allow developers to incorporate quantitatively estimated price thresholds for innovative products into target product profiles early in the product development cycle.

Indexed as

costingdiagnosticspoint-of-carescreeningsickle cell diseaseUganda

Identifiers

PMID30787644
PMCPMC6368125
OpenAlexW2911481594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.