Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787595›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2019

The benefit of taxane-based therapies over fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Tao Wang, Jie Yu, Min Liu, Yanliang Chen, Caiyun Zhu, Lin Lu, Mingzhu Wang, Lingfeng Min, Xinxin Liu, Xizhi Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Jie YuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Min LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Yanliang ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Caiyun ZhuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Lin LuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Mingzhu WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Lingfeng MinDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xinxin LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xizhi ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Johannes A GubatDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Yong ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, chenyong_jsyz@sina.com.
Yangzhou University · CNDalian Medical University · CNLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) is currently the standard treatment for esophageal cancer (EC). In recent years, taxane-based chemotherapy has also been used and has shown good efficacy in EC. This study aims to investigate the advantages of taxane-based over FP chemotherapy, as well as discuss its drawbacks, in the treatment of EC. PATIENTS AND

methodsA literature search was done for studies comparing clinical outcomes between taxane-based and FP chemotherapy in EC. Pooled analyses were performed to compare the efficacy and grade 3/4 adverse events in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Subgroup analyses were also conducted in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

resultsThirty-one studies with a total of 3,912 patients were included in the analysis. Better long-term survival was found in patients who received taxane-based NACT (progression-free survival (PFS): pooled HR=0.58,

conclusionCompared to FP, taxane-based therapy produced better clinical response and outcomes in EC patients receiving NACT or dCRT, and in all types of therapy in patients with ESCC. Taxane-based treatment is associated with more frequent toxicity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBridged-Ring CompoundsEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansOrganoplatinum CompoundsPyrimidinesTaxoids5-fluoropyrimidineAntineoplastic AgentsBridged-Ring CompoundsOrganoplatinum CompoundsPyrimidinestaxaneTaxoidschemotherapyclinical cancer researchdigestive cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID30787595
PMCPMC6368118
OpenAlexW2914557607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.