Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787594›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2019

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in the treatment of cancers: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.

Yan Tie, Hui Yang, Rui Zhao, Heng Zheng, Daoke Yang, Jingyi Zhao, Ming Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. TAPISTRY: A Phase II Study of Atezolizumab in Patients with Tumor Mutational Burden-High Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan TieCancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, mingliu721@aliyun.com.
Hui YangCancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, mingliu721@aliyun.com.
Rui ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Heng ZhengDepartment of Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Daoke YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingyi ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ming LiuCancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, mingliu721@aliyun.com.
Sichuan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors have developed rapidly and have demonstrated antitumor activity in various cancers. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in treating cancers, we conducted this meta-analysis.

methodsEmbase, PubMed, MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology database were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcomes were any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs. The secondary outcomes were overall objective response rate, pooled 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, median PFS, and median OS.

resultsOur meta-analysis was based on 14 clinical trials with 3,266 patients. The total risk of any grade AEs reached 69%, while grade ≥3 AEs happened in only 13% of participants. The overall atezolizumab-related death rate was 0.17%. Major common AEs involved fatigue (24.5%), decreased appetite (13.2%), nausea (12.3%), diarrhea (10.8%), pyrexia (10.7%), pruritus (9.6%), cough (9.5%), edema peripheral (8.6%), and rash (8.4%). The most common severe AEs were fatigue (2.2%), anemia (1.9%), and dyspnea (1.9%). Meanwhile, we found that 6% patients reached complete response and 16% partial response. The pooled 6-month PFS rate and 1-year OS rate were 0.36 (95% CI: 0.31-0.41) and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.49-0.61), respectively. The median PFS varied from 1.5 to 6.1 months, and the median OS ranged from 5.9 to 28.9 months.

conclusionAtezolizumab has a considerable potential in treating cancers with an acceptable risk profile.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agentsatezolizumabatezolizumabcancerefficacymeta-analysissafety

Identifiers

PMID30787594
PMCPMC6366347
OpenAlexW2911755565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.