Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

DirtyGenes: testing for significant changes in gene or bacterial population compositions from a small number of samples.

Laurence M Shaw, Adam Blanchard, Qinglin Chen, Xinli An, Peers Davies, Sabine Tötemeyer, Yong-Guan Zhu, Dov J Stekel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurence M ShawSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
Adam BlanchardSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6991-7210
Qinglin ChenChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Urban Environment, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Xinli AnChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Urban Environment, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Peers DaviesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
Sabine TötemeyerSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
Yong-Guan ZhuChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Urban Environment, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Dov J StekelSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK. dov.stekel@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2492-8079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High throughput genomics technologies are applied widely to microbiomes in humans, animals, soil and water, to detect changes in bacterial communities or the genes they carry, between different environments or treatments. We describe a method to test the statistical significance of differences in bacterial population or gene composition, applicable to metagenomic or quantitative polymerase chain reaction data. Our method goes beyond previous published work in being universally most powerful, thus better able to detect statistically significant differences, and through being more reliable for smaller sample sizes. It can also be used for experimental design, to estimate how many samples to use in future experiments, again with the advantage of being universally most powerful. We present three example analyses in the area of antimicrobial resistance. The first is to published data on bacterial communities and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment; we show that there are significant changes in both ARG and community composition. The second is to new data on seasonality in bacterial communities and ARGs in hooves from four sheep. While the observed differences are not significant, we show that a minimum group size of eight sheep would provide sufficient power to observe significance of similar changes in further experiments. The third is to published data on bacterial communities surrounding rice crops. This is a much larger data set and is used to verify the new method. Our method has broad uses for statistical testing and experimental design in research on changing microbiomes, including studies on antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

BacteriaAnimalsBiostatisticsChinaDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialHoof and ClawMetagenomeMicrobiotaOryzaRhizosphereSewageSheepSoil MicrobiologyUnited KingdomDNA, BacterialSewage

Identifiers

PMID30787410
PMCPMC6382752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.