Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787409›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Incentive salience attribution, "sensation-seeking" and "novelty-seeking" are independent traits in a large sample of male and female heterogeneous stock rats.

Alesa R Hughson, Aidan P Horvath, Katie Holl, Abraham A Palmer, Leah C Solberg Woods, Terry E Robinson, Shelly B Flagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Loci Influencing Cue-Reactivity in Heterogeneous Stock Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alesa R HughsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Aidan P HorvathDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Katie HollDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Abraham A PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Leah C Solberg WoodsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Molecular Medicine, Center on Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Terry E RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Shelly B FlagelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. sflagel@umich.edu.

Funding

Sequencing CoreP50DA037844 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PALMER, ABRAHAM A · 2014 to 2023
$27.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA037844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are a number of traits that are thought to increase susceptibility to addiction, and some of these are modeled in preclinical studies. For example, "sensation-seeking" is predictive of the initial propensity to take drugs; whereas "novelty-seeking" predicts compulsive drug-seeking behavior. In addition, the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues can predict the propensity to approach drug cues, and reinstatement or relapse, even after relatively brief periods of drug exposure. The question addressed here is the extent to which these three 'vulnerability factors' are related; that is, predictive of one another. Some relationships have been reported in small samples, but here a large sample of 1,598 outbred male and female heterogeneous stock rats were screened for Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior (to obtain an index of incentive salience attribution; 'sign-tracking'), and subsequently tested for sensation-seeking and novelty-seeking. Despite the large N there were no significant correlations between these traits, in either males or females. There were, however, novel relationships between multiple measures of incentive salience attribution and, based on these findings, we generated a new metric that captures "incentive value". Furthermore, there were sex differences on measures of incentive salience attribution and sensation-seeking behavior that were not previously apparent.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Outbred StrainsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalCuesDrug-Seeking BehaviorExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleMotivationRatsRewardSensation

Identifiers

PMID30787409
PMCPMC6382850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.