ArticleScientific reports2019
Interoceptive sensibility tunes risk-taking behaviour when body-related stimuli come into play.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulating the Interplay Between Impulsivity and Interoception Through HD-tDCS to the Right Insula and Anterior Cingulate Cortex.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Maternal interoceptive focus is associated with greater reported engagement in mother-infant stroking and rocking.PloS one · 2024Article
- Body appearance values modulate risk aversion in eating restriction.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023Article
- Self-reported interoception, worries and protective behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023Article
- Article
- Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Connectivity adaptations in dopaminergic systems define the brain maturity of investors.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Linking perception of bodily states and cognitive control: the role of interoception in impulsive behaviour.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Article
- Pathological risk-propensity typifies Mafia members' cognitive profile.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In everyday life, we continuously make decisions, assuming the risk by making choices on material possessions or our body. Bodily signals may support the decision-making process, informing us about possible outcomes. Sensibility for such internal bodily changes influences the way we perceive the environment, and it can boost the body-related stimuli processing. Thus, the question arises of whether the individual sensibility to interoceptive signals modulates decision-making in the presence of biological stimuli. To test this hypothesis, we administered 50 healthy subjects with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, in which participants were required to inflate a virtual balloon, and a modified version of it, in which they inflated a virtual body. We found that interoceptive sensibility predicted risk-taking behaviour only in the presence of body-related stimuli. Our results provided new evidence on the role of interoceptive sensibility in complex cognitive functions, such as risk-taking behaviour, which impacts the way we act within our society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.