Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787081›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Use of biologics during pregnancy and risk of serious infections in the mother and baby: a Canadian population-based cohort study.

Nicole W Tsao, Larry D Lynd, Eric C Sayre, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Gillian Hanley, Mary A De Vera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Review
  14. The use and impact of monoclonal antibody biologics during pregnancy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole W TsaoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Larry D LyndFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Eric C SayreArthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohsen SadatsafaviFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gillian HanleyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mary A De VeraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAResearch Canada · CA

Funding

CIHR AO1-151540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the association between exposure to biologics during pregnancy and serious infections in mothers and infants.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingPopulation-based.

participantsWomen with one or more autoimmune diseases identified by International Classification of Diseases 9th/10th revision codes in healthcare administrative databases in British Columbia, Canada, who had pregnancies ending in a live or stillbirth between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2012. Women were defined as exposed if they had at least one biologic prescription during pregnancy, and infants born to these women were considered exposed in utero. Disease-matched women with no biologics prescriptions during pregnancy, and their infants, comprised the unexposed groups. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Serious infections requiring hospitalisation.

resultsOver the 10-year study period, there were 6218 women (8607 pregnancies) who had an autoimmune disease diagnosis, of which 90 women were exposed to biologics during pregnancy, with 100 babies born to these women. Among women exposed to biologics during pregnancy, occurrence of serious postpartum infections were low, ranging from 0% to 5%, depending on concomitant exposures to immunosuppressants. In multivariable models using logistic regression, the OR for the association of biologics exposure with serious maternal postpartum infections was 0.79 (95% CI 0.24 to 2.54). In infants exposed to biologics in utero, occurrence of serious infections during the first year of life ranged from 0% to 7%, depending on concomitant exposures to immunosuppressants in utero. Multivariable models showed no association between biologics exposure in utero and serious infant infections (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.81).

conclusionsThese population-based data suggest that the use of biologics by women with autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of serious infections in mothers, during post partum or in infants during the first year of life.

Indexed as

AdultAutoimmune DiseasesBiological ProductsBritish ColumbiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRetrospective StudiesBiological Productsadverse eventsepidemiologyinflammatory bowel diseaserheumatology

Identifiers

PMID30787081
PMCPMC6398640
OpenAlexW2916985161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.