Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30787053›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

Disparities and Trends in Genetic Testing and Erlotinib Treatment among Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Lauren L Palazzo, Deirdre F Sheehan, Angela C Tramontano, Chung Yin Kong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sex-based inequities in non-small cell lung cancer: gaps and opportunities across the care pathway.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren L PalazzoInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deirdre F SheehanInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela C TramontanoInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chung Yin KongInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. joey@mgh-ita.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-7830
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention and Control PoliciesU01CA199284 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
Optimizing Treatment of Lung Cancer Patients with ComorbiditiesR01CA202956 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KONG, CHUNG YIN, WISNIVESKY, JUAN P · 2016 to 2019
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202956NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite reports of socioeconomic disparities in rates of genetic testing and targeted therapy treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), little is known about whether such disparities are changing over time.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis to identify disparities and trends in genetic testing and treatment with erlotinib. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified 9,900 patients with stage IV NSCLC diagnosed in 2007 to 2011 at age 65 or older. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify patient factors associated with odds of receiving a genetic test and erlotinib treatment, and to assess trends in these differences with respect to diagnosis year.

resultsPatients were more likely to receive genetic testing if they were under age 75 at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 1.55] independent of comorbidity level, and this age-based gap showed a decrease over time (OR, 0.93). For untested patients, erlotinib treatment was associated with race (OR, 0.58, black vs. white; OR, 2.45, Asian vs. white), and was more likely among female patients (OR, 1.45); for tested patients, erlotinib treatment was less likely among low-income patients (OR, 0.32). Most of these associations persisted or increased in magnitude.

conclusionsRace and sex are associated with rates of erlotinib treatment for patients who did not receive genetic testing, and low-income status is associated with treatment rates for those who did receive testing. The racial disparity remained stable over time, while the income-based disparity grew larger. IMPACT: Attention to reducing disparities is needed as precision cancer treatments continue to be developed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleBlack or African AmericanCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGenetic TestingHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMedicareMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30787053
PMCPMC6500471
OpenAlexW2917450113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.