ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019
Quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: agreement of software from three different vendors on assessment of left ventricular function, 2D flow and parametric mapping.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Guideline
- Variation in left ventricular cardiac magnetic resonance normal reference ranges: systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Quantifying hepatic arterial blood flow with 4D flow MRI: an in vivo feasibility and repeatability study.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Assessing the robustness of an artificial intelligence segmentation model for quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging across cardiac phenotypes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- A semi-automated quality assurance tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: application to outlier detection, artificial intelligence evaluation and trainee feedback.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Beyond volumes and ejection fraction: practical insights into cine-CMR interpretation and applications.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Reproducibility assessment of biventricular strain derived from Long-Axis feature tracking in travelling Volunteers - A study in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Repeatability and reproducibility of hemodynamic measurements by intracranial 4D Flow MRI: a multi‑vendor and multi‑software cross‑over comparison study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- New Solution for Segmental Assessment of Left Ventricular Wall Thickness, Using Anatomically Accurate and Highly Reproducible Automated Cardiac MRI Software.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-term cardiac MRI follow up of MANTICORE (Multidisciplinary Approach to Novel Therapies in Cardio-Oncology REsearch).Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Cardiac compressed sensing real-time cine for the assessment of left ventricular function: a large sample size analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Quadratic stratification of left ventricular hypertrophy and association with mitral insufficiency grading: a retrospective study using cardiac magnetic resonance.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- The influence of post-processing software on quantitative results in 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Inter-site comparability of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in healthy traveling volunteers-a multi-site and multi-magnetic field strength study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Trajectories of functional and structural myocardial parameters in post-COVID-19 syndrome-insights from mid-term follow-up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Flow evaluation software for four-dimensional flow MRI: a reliability and validation study.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Myocardial strain: a clinical review.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative results of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) image analysis influence clinical decision making. Image analysis is performed based on dedicated software. The manufacturers provide different analysis tools whose algorithms are often unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of software on quantification of left ventricular (LV) assessment, 2D flow measurement and T1- and T2-parametric mapping.
methodsThirty-one data sets of patients who underwent a CMR Scan on 1.5 T were analyzed using three different software (Circle CVI: cvi
resultsFor each parameter, thirty data sets could be analyzed with all three software. All three software (A/B, A/C, B/C) were considered equivalent for LV EF, EDV, ESV, mass, 2D flow SV and T2-time. Differences between software were detected in flow measurement for Vmax and in parametric mapping for T1-time. For Vmax, equivalence was given between software A and C and for T1-time equivalence was given between software B and C.
conclusionSoftware had no impact on quantitative results of LV assessment, T2-time and SV based on 2D flow. In contrast to that, Vmax and T1-time may be influenced by software. CMR reports should contain the name and version of the software applied for image analysis to avoid misinterpretation upon follow-up and research examinations.
trial registrationISRCTN12210850 . Registered 14 July 2017, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.