Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30786766›Full record

ArticleHealth (London, England : 1997)2019

Public involvement in research about environmental change and health: A case study.

Kath Maguire, Ruth Garside, Jo Poland, Lora E Fleming, Ian Alcock, Tim Taylor, Helen Macintyre, Gianni Lo Iacono, Andrew Green, Benedict W Wheeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health (London, England : 1997), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Roses Ocean and Human Health Chair: A New Way to Engage the Public in Oceans and Human Health Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruth GarsideUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Jo PolandHealth and Environment Public Engagement (HEPE), UK.
Lora E Fleming
Ian Alcock
Tim TaylorUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Helen MacintyrePublic Health England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-7903
Gianni Lo IaconoUniversity of Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-2843
Andrew GreenHealth and Environment Public Engagement (HEPE), UK.
Benedict W WheelerUniversity of Exeter, UK.

Funding

Department of Health KMRF-2016-05-014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involving and engaging the public are crucial for effective prioritisation, dissemination and implementation of research about the complex interactions between environments and health. Involvement is also important to funders and policy makers who often see it as vital for building trust and justifying the investment of public money. In public health research, 'the public' can seem an amorphous target for researchers to engage with, and the short-term nature of research projects can be a challenge. Technocratic and pedagogical approaches have frequently met with resistance, so public involvement needs to be seen in the context of a history which includes contested truths, power inequalities and political activism. It is therefore vital for researchers and policy makers, as well as public contributors, to share best practice and to explore the challenges encountered in public involvement and engagement. This article presents a theoretically informed case study of the contributions made by the Health and Environment Public Engagement Group to the work of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Change and Health (HPRU-ECH). We describe how Health and Environment Public Engagement Group has provided researchers in the HPRU-ECH with a vehicle to support access to public views on multiple aspects of the research work across three workshops, discussion of ongoing research issues at meetings and supporting dissemination to local government partners, as well as public representation on the HPRU-ECH Advisory Board. We conclude that institutional support for standing public involvement groups can provide conduits for connecting public with policy makers and academic institutions. This can enable public involvement and engagement, which would be difficult, if not impossible, to achieve in individual short-term and unconnected research projects.

Indexed as

Environment DesignHealth StatusPublic HealthAdministrative PersonnelCommunity ParticipationHealth PolicyHumansResearchenvironment and healthhealth policyissues in research methodologytheory

Identifiers

PMID30786766
PMCPMC6388412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.