Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30786304›Full record

Trial reportRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2019

Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rogevando Rodrigues Nunes, André Montenegro Primo

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rogevando Rodrigues NunesGraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6025-1480
André Montenegro PrimoGraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Universidade de Fortaleza · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia.

methodsIn a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiting uterine cervix dilatation ≥ 5 cm, were selected to receive a single intravenous dose of either 0.25 mg/kg of pethidine (

resultsThere was a significant improvement in pain in 35% of the parturients. Both drugs presented a similar analgesic effect 1 hour after the intervention (

conclusionPethidine in low doses and dipyrone presented equivalent analgesia during labor. PUBLIC REGISTRY OF CLINICAL TRIALS: RBR-4hsyy4.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidApgar ScoreDipyroneDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLabor PainMeperidinePregnancyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidDipyroneMeperidine

Identifiers

PMID30786304
PMCPMC10418355
OpenAlexW2920093763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.